The Hollywood Star and Studio Systems - Part One

Gallery 1: Columbia Pictures and Hollywood in the 1950s

Gallery 2: Columbia Pictures - Films and Stars

Gallery 3: The Star and Studio Systems as experienced by Tab Hunter and Robert Wagner

Gallery 4: Robert Francis’ Rise from Unknown to Star as documented in photographs and stories from 1953 and 1954

By July 4, 1949, when Bob Francis was discovered (or when he discovered being a film actor might be a career option), the Hollywood Studio System had already received a death blow: a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court anti-trust decision forced the studios to separate their film production activities and their exhibition activities (block booking of their own productions in their own theaters). The decision especially affected the Big Five (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Paramount Pictures, RKO Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers) which had vast production studios, distribution divisions, nationwide theater chains, and numerous contracts with actors and filmmakers. The Little Three (Columbia Pictures, Universal Pictures, United Artists) had few, if any, theaters and were less affected. The second death blow came from television sets in the homes of millions people who no longer felt the need to leave their homes two or three times each week and go to the movies.

The lethal nature of these changes played out over a decade or two with studios not renewing contracts with actors (many of whom formed their own independent companies) and producing television programs in addition to movies. These changes in turn created the need for more adjustment and accommodation — and thus, today’s Hollywood Moguls are independent filmmakers and agents who can package stars, directors, writers, etc., for a particular film and specifically targeted audiences. Today’s stars and sometimes celebrities, often famous for being infamous, must invent and re-invent themselves without much attention to long-term career goals and without much guidance from long-time and loyal “starmakers” associated with a studio and its commitment to profitability.

"It wasn't good entertainment and it wasn't art, and most of the movies produced had a uniform mediocrity, but they were also uniformly profitable ... The million-dollar mediocrity was the very backbone of Hollywood."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_system

Gallery 1: Columbia Pictures and Hollywood in the 1950s

Gallery 2: Columbia Pictures - Films and Stars

But in the early 1950s enough of the Star and Studio Systems remained in place to continue “…creating, promoting, and exploiting…promising young actors” who might be glamorized and given personae with new names and backgrounds. “The Star System put emphasis on the image rather than the acting, although discreet acting, voice, and dancing lessons were a common part of the regiment.”

Everyone employed by a studio, especially public relations personnel, worked to create a star persona and generate publicity. The studios also sought to cover up incidents or lifestyles that could damage a public image. Fan magazine writers and editors, private detectives, lawyers, and police officers were part of a vast network that aided and abetted the studios in both the manufacturing and protecting (sometimes from themselves) of movie stars and contract players.

The decline of the Star System parallels that of the Studio System. Major stars rebelled at the artistic control of the studios as well as the control of their private lives. The rise of publications like Confidential in the 1950s undermined the in loco parentis practices of the studios. (The Star System continues today, however, in that stars or celebrities draw devoted fans to films, television shows, music concerts just as in the past — despite almost daily revelations about them, some self-generated on social media, that would never have become public in earlier years.)

Both Robert Wagner and Tab Hunter, Star and Studio System products of Bob’s generation, published autobiographies that speak to the good and bad of those systems. Wagner and his co-author, Scott Eyman, write in Pieces of My Heart, “Fox…was very interested in me in terms of generating publicity, but it had a very limited interest in what was best for me as a human being…the studio was looking for a saleable commodity….” (p. 73) And, “…(today’s) increased independence also means that it’s everybody for himself — there’s no studio watching out for young actors, trying to build a career step by step. The only people with a vested interest in young talent are managers and agents, and there aren’t many who possess a developmental skill set….” (p. 319)

Hunter and his co-author, Eddie Muller, write in Tab Hunter Confidential: The Making of a Movie Star, “…she (Debbie Reynolds) enjoyed the security of a long-term contract at MGM. The studio had mapped out a strategy, guiding her step-by-step, coaching her singing and dancing, arranged all her publicity, managing her steady progress in a way any freelancer would have envied.” (p. 75)

Hunter’s take on these systems, unlike Wagner’s, is shaped by his early freelance status (much more difficult then than now when it is the norm) and his need to keep secret his sexual orientation. Wagner’s experiences as a contract player probably more closely resembles Bob’s. (Wagner, born on Feb. 10, 1920, just 16 days before Bob’s birth, had a more privileged life in Detroit and Bel Air than Bob, but their careers have similar arcs. Wagner worked his way through small roles to fan magazine stardom and then significant supporting and leading roles. Bob began in a significant supporting role then played leading roles in two of his four movies.)

Gallery 3: The Star and Studio Systems as experienced by Tab Hunter and Robert Wagner

Bob’s two years in the systems provide a perfect case study of how a young player — showing enormous promise as a fan magazine favorite and a box-office attraction — would be handled, groomed, invented, launched, and secured as a “property." The intense focus of making four films in a 10-month period (June 1953-May 1954) followed by an equally intense focus on promotion and publicity, magazine photo shoots, and personal appearance tours (Spring/Summer 1954-Summer 1955) reveal a strategy designed to help Bob step into major roles in A-level films and to become a perennial favorite of fans, young and old, who would buy tickets at the box office. With some additional luck, the young man would also become a good actor and live comfortably in his own skin in the ever-fickle world of show business and movie stardom. Bob’s ace-in-the-hole was how closely his movie persona and his real life were in sync. Bob was almost, if not completely, what he seemed: an ambitious, mature young man with great joie de vivre and few, if any, secrets to hide.

The following Gallery documents Bob’s ascent from unknown to well-known (at least in the fan magazine world) and how much of his time (post-The Long Gray Line and pre-Tribute to a Bad Man) was given over to promotional and personal appearance tours, photo shoots, and his efforts to grow and improve as an actor and star personality.

Gallery 4: Robert Francis’ Rise from Unknown to Star as documented in photographs and stories from 1953 and 1954